Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
TBD
SAR 149327
TBD
SAR 143635
TBD
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 397.27
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
200 km/h
6
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5100
4760 mm
1994
1930 mm
1756
1927 mm
3010
2750 mm
566
400 L
/
5 Doors
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
9.1
10 Km/L
/
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.3 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
345 BHP
224 BHP
500
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
