Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus vs X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Stylish and attractive exterior design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Excellent financial value for money for features
Negative
- The quality of internal manufacturing needs to be improved
- The suspension system needs better tuning
- Noise control is poor on highways
Price Comparison
TBD
SAR 105129
TBD
SAR 101144
TBD
SAR 1415
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 384.45
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
220 km/h
6
4
/
1598 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
7
5100
4749 mm
1994
1900 mm
1756
1720 mm
3010
2745 mm
566
480 L
/
5 Doors
/
210 mm
Fuel Economy
9.1
13 Km/L
/
57 L
/
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.3 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
345 BHP
197 BHP
500
290 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
