MG ZS 2023 1.5L STD vs Changan CS35 2020 1.6L Full Option (2WD) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 66038
SAR 66938
SAR 63490
SAR 64389
SAR 889
SAR 901
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.29
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 72.03
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 264.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 308.7
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3755.85
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
SUV
/
10.9
/
Engine / Motor
170
180
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4314
4160
1809
1810
1624
1670
2585
2560
448
348
Fuel Economy
17.2
13.9
48
52
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
112 BHP
123 BHP
150
160
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
