Mitsubishi Attrage 2024 1.2 GLX LL vs Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Low fuel consumption
- Low maintenance cost
- Easy maneuverability in the city
Negative
- Engine performance is modest
- Limited internal quality
- Insufficient noise insulation
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Price Comparison
TBD
SAR 217026
TBD
SAR 208826
TBD
SAR 2921
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.83
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.78
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 174.75
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 384.45
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2126.13
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
210
4
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4245
5040
1670
1905
1515
1479
2550
3052
450
455
Fuel Economy
20.0
9.3
42
70
Comfort
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✔
/
Exterior
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.2 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
76 BHP
300 BHP
100
358
Technologies
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
