CarteaCompare CarsMitsubishi Pajero 2024 3.5L 3 Door mid vs Tang L EV 670 Standard

Mitsubishi Pajero 2024 3.5L 3 Door mid vs Tang L EV 670 Standard Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Price Comparison

SAR 1655519

TBD

SAR 1592992

TBD

SAR 22282

TBD

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.13 L/KM

0 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

SAR 15.15

Daily Fule Payment

/

Weekly Fule Payment

SAR 106.02

Weekly Fule Payment

/

Monthly Fule Payment

SAR 454.35

Monthly Fule Payment

/

Yearly Fule Payment

SAR 5527.93

Yearly Fule Payment

/

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

12.5

/

Engine / Motor

180

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

7

4385

5040

1875

1996

1850

1760

2560

2950

500

/

Fuel Economy

7.7

/

69

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

DHT

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

/

Engine

3.5 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

184 BHP

680 BHP

303

/

Technologies

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi Related Car

BYD Related Car