Mitsubishi Pajero 2024 3.5L 3 Door mid vs X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Stylish and attractive exterior design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Excellent financial value for money for features
Negative
- The quality of internal manufacturing needs to be improved
- The suspension system needs better tuning
- Noise control is poor on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 1655519
SAR 105129
SAR 1592992
SAR 101144
SAR 22282
SAR 1415
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.13 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.15
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 106.02
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 454.35
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5527.93
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
220 km/h
/
4
/
1598 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4385
4749 mm
1875
1900 mm
1850
1720 mm
2560
2745 mm
500
480 L
/
5 Doors
/
210 mm
Fuel Economy
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Engine
3.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
184 BHP
197 BHP
303
290 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
