Model 3 Long Range RWD vs Qin Plus FWD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Outstanding driving and acceleration performance
- Advanced technology and intelligent user experience
- High efficiency and environmental sustainability
Negative
- Manufacturing quality needs to be improved
- Less comfortable seats on long flights
- Customer service experience may not always be consistent
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 190718
SAR 94500
SAR 183490
SAR 90900
SAR 2567
SAR 1272
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.04 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.88
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 41.16
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 176.4
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2146.2
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
225 km/h
185
American
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
18" or 19"
17
4 Doors
4
4720 mm
4765
2089 mm
1837
1441 mm
1495
2875 mm
2720
682 L
500
138 mm
/
/
Flush Door
/
1500
Fuel Economy
/
26
/
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
Sensatec Leather
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
8.8
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
/
Front Row
Infotainment
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
✓
/
10.1-inch rotating screen
/
✓
/
6
Battery/Charging
/
6.6
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Air
MacPherson
Air
Torsion Beam
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Wheels/brakes
/
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Hybrid
325 BHP
197 BHP
420 Nm
325
/
1.5 L
/
Plug in Hybrid
Motor
6
/
Lithium Iron Phosphate
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
145
/
325
/
1
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
