Nissan Kicks 2023 1.6 S vs MG ZS 2023 1.5L LUX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
SAR 75032
SAR 77710
SAR 72159
SAR 74750
SAR 1010
SAR 1046
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.64
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.64
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 60.48
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 60.48
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 259.2
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 259.2
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3153.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3153.6
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
170
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4295
4314
1960
1809
1590
1624
2620
2585
432
448
Fuel Economy
15.4
17.2
41
48
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
112 BHP
149
150
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
