Peugeot RCZ 2016 Sport vs Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 2023 4.0L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful engine performance and excellent driving interaction
- Sporty and luxurious exterior design draws attention
- High-end interior quality and advanced driving technologies
Negative
- High price and large maintenance costs
- Limited driving comfort on normal roads
- Limited space for passengers and luggage
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 244.65
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 314.55
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
4.0
Engine / Motor
213
304
4
/
Dimensions
4 Seater
2 Seater
4287
4546
1845
1939
1359
1288
2612
2630
384
285
Fuel Economy
13.7
10.8
55
65
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.6 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
163 BHP
469 BHP
240
630
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
