Peugeot RCZ 2016 Sport vs Nissan GT-R 2023 Black Edition Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful engine performance, suitable for high acceleration
- Excellent control and stability when driving fast
- Bold and attractive exterior design
Negative
- Purchase and maintenance costs are high
- Relatively poor fuel economy
- Ride comfort is limited by suspension stiffness
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.12 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.08
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 17.28
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 70.56
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 120.96
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 282.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 483.84
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3679.2
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 6307.2
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
2.8
Engine / Motor
213
315
4
6
Dimensions
4 Seater
4 Seater
4287
4710
1845
1895
1359
1370
2612
2780
384
249
Fuel Economy
13.7
8.5
55
72
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
3.8 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
163 BHP
565 BHP
240
637
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
