Porsche Taycan 2024 Turbo S vs Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 2023 4.0L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- High level electrical performance
- Ultra-luxurious interior design
- Advanced driving technology
Negative
- Limited driving range compared to competitors
- High initial price
- Small background storage space
Positive
- Powerful engine performance and excellent driving interaction
- Sporty and luxurious exterior design draws attention
- High-end interior quality and advanced driving technologies
Negative
- High price and large maintenance costs
- Limited driving comfort on normal roads
- Limited space for passengers and luggage
Price Comparison
SAR 1097613
TBD
SAR 1056165
TBD
SAR 14773
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 325.04
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
2.8
4.0
Engine / Motor
260
304
N/A, Electric
/
Dimensions
4 Seater
2 Seater
4963
4546
1966
1939
1381
1288
2900
2630
429
285
Fuel Economy
/
10.8
/
65
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
0.0 L
4.0 L
Electric
Gasoline
625 BHP
469 BHP
1050
630
Technologies
✓
/
