Prado TXR 2.4T vs Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong performance in rough terrain
- Reliability and durability
- Spacious and comfortable interior
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High maintenance and repair costs
- Traditional interior design
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Price Comparison
SAR 212120
SAR 212704
SAR 204097
SAR 204620
SAR 2855
SAR 2863
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 325.04
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 397.27
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
190
4
6
2393 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
8
5 Doors
/
4925 mm
5046
1980 mm
1975
1925 mm
1795
2850 mm
2900
104 L
470
221 m
/
Fuel Economy
10.6 Km/L
9.4
110 L
74
10.6 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
3-Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.4 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
267 BHP
271 BHP
430 Nm
340
/
V6 9AT
/
271 @ 6,400
/
340 @ 4,800
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
