Qin L 80KM Lead vs Honda Civic 2023 1.5T Sport Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- High fuel efficiency
- Long lasting reliability
- High quality interior design
Negative
- Limited rear space for passengers
- Average off road performance
- An insufficiently innovative infotainment system
Price Comparison
TBD
SAR 149327
TBD
SAR 143635
TBD
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.04 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 4.66
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 32.62
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 139.8
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 209.7
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 1700.9
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210
/
4
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
/
4674
/
1801
/
1415
/
2736
/
413
Fuel Economy
25
15.4
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
E-CVT
Automatic
/
✓
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
101 BHP
180 BHP
/
240
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
