Qin Plus Premium vs Honda Accord 2023 1.5T EX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Smooth and safe driving experience
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Spacious and comfortable interior
Negative
- Screen technologies and user interface need to be improved
- Traditional exterior design lacks innovation
- Off-road performance affects comfort
Price Comparison
SAR 79498
SAR 146887
SAR 76487
SAR 141335
SAR 1070
SAR 1977
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.04 L/KM
0.05 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 4.66
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.83
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 32.62
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.78
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 139.8
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 174.75
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 1700.9
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2126.13
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
195
/
4
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
1500
/
17
/
4
/
4765
4890
1837
1860
1495
1450
2720
2830
500
473
Fuel Economy
26
18.5
48
56
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
8.8
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
/
Sensatec Leather
/
✓
✓
Dual
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1-inch rotating screen
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
6.6
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson
/
Torsion Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
Manual
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Plug in Hybrid
/
177 BHP
198 BHP
325
260
Motor
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
