QX50 Sport vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
SAR 240874
TBD
SAR 231767
TBD
SAR 3242
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.13
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 63.91
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 314.55
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 273.9
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3332.45
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
230
/
4
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4693
5115
1903
1980
1679
1920
2800
/
895
/
Fuel Economy
11.1
9.3
60
110
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
✓
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Diesel
268 BHP
304 BHP
380
700
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
