QX60 Sensory vs Prado VXL-3 Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Strong performance in rough terrain
- Reliability and durability
- Spacious and comfortable interior
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High maintenance and repair costs
- Traditional interior design
Price Comparison
SAR 297116
SAR 299641
SAR 285880
SAR 288305
SAR 3999
SAR 4033
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 16.17
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.23
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 113.19
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 92.61
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 485.1
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 396.9
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5902.05
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4828.95
Hide common specs
Car Information
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
5033
5025
1981
1980
1770
1992
2900
/
170
/
/
20
Fuel Economy
8.7
10.6
/
110
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Doors
/
Front & Rear Doors
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Front Row Seats
Front and Back Row Seats
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Triple
Dual
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
Front Airbags Driver & Passenger + D&P Knee + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
14
Transmission
AT
8-Speed Automatic Transmission
/
✓
/
Central
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
265/60 R20
/
265/60 R20
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5
2.4
Gasoline
Gasoline
279
267
350
430
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
