QX80 Autograph Bench Chairs vs Tiggo 9 Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful motor and smooth performance
- Luxurious interior design and spacious space
- Advanced technology and intelligent features
Negative
- Low fuel consumption
- The large size of the car affects the controllability
- Maintenance costs and cutting prices are high
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 541182
SAR 127197
SAR 520710
SAR 122381
SAR 7284
SAR 1712
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.12 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 17.28
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 120.96
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 535.68
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 6307.2
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
/
8
/
Dimensions
7
5
5365
4820
2030
1930
1945
1712
3075
2820
470
/
Fuel Economy
8.3
/
100
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
Driver Seat
14
10.25
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
up to 10
Infotainment
14
15.6
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
24
14
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
Automatic
AT
✓
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
3.5
2.0L
Gasoline
Gasoline
450
250
700
390
/
Turbocharge
/
2.0T GDI
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard / Eco / Sport / Personal / Rock / Sand
Economic + Standard + Sports Sandy + Road + Muddy + Ground + Snowfield + Off Road
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
19 ADAS Functions
/
✓
/
✓
