Raize Limited vs ZS 1.5L STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Compact size for flexible urban driving
- Integrated technological equipment
Negative
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- The quality of interior materials need improvement
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
SAR 76663
SAR 57134
SAR 73715
SAR 54970
SAR 1032
SAR 769
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.83
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.78
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 180.58
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2126.13
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
3
/
/
170
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
17
17
4030
4323
1710
1809
1635
1653
/
1318
/
5
/
2585
/
359/1166
/
145
Fuel Economy
20.6
17.2
36
45
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Driver Seat
Front Row Seats
Fabric
Fabric
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver And Front Passenger
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
10.1
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
4
4
/
✓
Transmission
Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
/
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
Wheels/brakes
205/60 R17
215/55 R17
205/60 R17
215/55 R17
/
Disc
/
Disc
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
LED
Engine
1.0
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
✓
/
97
118 BHP
140
180
/
88
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
