Raize XLE vs T01 Adventurer Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Compact size for flexible urban driving
- Integrated technological equipment
Negative
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- The quality of interior materials need improvement
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 69689
SAR 127048
SAR 67045
SAR 122237
SAR 938
SAR 1710
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.58
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 21.07
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 67.03
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 147.46
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 296.83
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 653.02
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3494.88
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 7688.73
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
3
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
16
17"
4030
4705
1710
1895
1635
1936
/
2150
/
2860
/
1598
/
1598
/
235
/
40
/
36
/
23.6
Fuel Economy
21.1
9.1
36
80
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.25-inch
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front
Safety
Driver And Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
7
12.3-inch
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
4
/
/
✓
Transmission
Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)
8AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
5-Link Rigid Axle Suspension
/
5-Link Rigid Axle Suspension
Wheels/brakes
205/65 R16
/
205/65 R16
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.2
2.0L
Gasoline
Gasoline
87
248 BHP
113
410
/
Turbocharge
Technologies
✓
/
✓
• Standard • Economic • Sport • Snow • Sand • Rock • Mud • Wade • Mountain • Uneven
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)