Raize XLE vs Urban Cruiser GL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Compact size for flexible urban driving
- Integrated technological equipment
Negative
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- The quality of interior materials need improvement
Positive
- Stylish exterior design meets the taste of youth
- Economical fuel consumption suitable for daily commuting
- Reliable service network and rich security features
Negative
- The engine performance is average, especially at high speeds
- Limited back row space for large families
- The entertainment and control system is simple compared to competitors
Price Comparison
SAR 69689
SAR 86183
SAR 67045
SAR 82915
SAR 938
SAR 1160
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.05 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.83
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.83
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.78
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.78
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 180.58
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 180.58
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2126.13
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2126.13
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
3
4
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
16
17
4030
4365
1710
1795
1635
1645
/
2600
/
210
Fuel Economy
21.1
19.8
36
45 L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Driver Seat
/
Fabric
Fabric
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Rear
Safety
Driver And Front Passenger
Driver And Front Passenger + Side + Curtain
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
7
9
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
4
4
/
✓
Transmission
Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)
6 Speed Automatic Transmission
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
205/65 R16
215/60 R17
205/65 R16
215/60 R17
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Halogen
LED
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.2
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
87
101 BHP
113
135
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
