Raize XLE vs ZS 1.5L STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Compact size for flexible urban driving
- Integrated technological equipment
Negative
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- The quality of interior materials need improvement
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
SAR 69689
SAR 57134
SAR 67045
SAR 54970
SAR 938
SAR 769
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 7.2
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.64
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 50.4
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 60.48
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 201.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 241.92
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2628
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3153.6
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
3
/
/
170
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
16
17
4030
4323
1710
1809
1635
1653
/
1318
/
5
/
2585
/
359/1166
/
145
Fuel Economy
21.1
17.2
36
45
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Driver Seat
Front Row Seats
Fabric
Fabric
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver And Front Passenger
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
7
10.1
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
4
4
/
✓
Transmission
Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
/
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
Wheels/brakes
205/65 R16
215/55 R17
205/65 R16
215/55 R17
/
Disc
/
Disc
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Halogen
LED
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.2
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
87
118 BHP
113
180
/
88
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
