Sonata 2.5 GDI Base vs Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive design
- Advanced safety technology and systems
- Excellent driving comfort
Negative
- Higher fuel consumption than competitors
- The weight of the car is a little heavy
- Luggage compartment storage capacity is limited
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Price Comparison
SAR 81203
SAR 217026
SAR 78114
SAR 208826
SAR 1093
SAR 2921
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 209.7
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 384.45
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
194
210
/
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
2035
/
4
/
4910
5040
1860
1905
1445
1479
2840
3052
/
455
Fuel Economy
16.6
9.3
/
70
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
MacPherson Strut Type
/
Multi-Link Type
/
/
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated disc, 1-pot caliper
/
Solid disc, 1-pot caliper
/
Engine
2.5 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
/
300 BHP
/
358
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
