Song L 75KM Lead vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.04 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.76
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.85
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 68.92
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 161.28
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 275.66
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2102.4
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3593.43
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
6
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
/
5115
/
1980
/
1920
Fuel Economy
26
9.3
/
110
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
EHS
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.3 L
Hybrid
Diesel
100 BHP
304 BHP
/
700
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
