Sportage Smartstream 2.0L vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern design and comfortable cabin
- Spacious interior and comfortable seating
- Comprehensive intelligent technology and specifications
Negative
- Poor performance at high speeds
- The transmission response is slow when accelerating
- Internal materials need to be improved
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 102970
SAR 149327
SAR 99046
SAR 143635
SAR 1386
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
1998 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
5 Doors
4515 mm
4760 mm
865 mm
1930 mm
1650 mm
1927 mm
2680 mm
2750 mm
591 L
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
10 Km/L
54 L
75 L
12 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Single
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
8
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
8
9
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
152 BHP
224 BHP
192 Nm
387 Nm
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
