Supra Track Edition AT vs Nissan GT-R 2023 Black Edition Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Power performance and Sports Control
- Unique and attractive exterior design
- Quality workmanship and attention to detail
Negative
- Limited seating and storage space
- Limited driving comfort due to the suspension
- High cost compared to competitors
Positive
- Powerful engine performance, suitable for high acceleration
- Excellent control and stability when driving fast
- Bold and attractive exterior design
Negative
- Purchase and maintenance costs are high
- Relatively poor fuel economy
- Ride comfort is limited by suspension stiffness
Price Comparison
SAR 286860
TBD
SAR 276000
TBD
SAR 3861
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.12 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.98
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 97.86
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 252.81
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 433.38
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5102.7
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
2.8
Engine / Motor
6
6
/
315
Dimensions
2
4 Seater
19
/
4379
4710
1854
1895
1299
1370
/
2780
/
249
Fuel Economy
14.4
8.5
52
72
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
✓
Dual
/
✓
/
Bucket
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Driver Airbag, Driver Knee Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags, Curtain Airbags.
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8.8
/
✓
✓
12
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
8-Speed Automatic Transmission
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
/
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
255/35 R19
/
275/35 R19
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0
3.8 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Scroll
/
382
565 BHP
500
637
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
