T1 Comfort 2026 vs Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Strong performance in its price category
- Spacious and comfortable interior
Negative
- Fuel economy can be improved
- Limited options for the entertainment system
- A less widespread agent network
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 384.45
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210
/
6
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
4705
5100
1967
1994
1843
1756
2800
3010
1690
/
1700
/
574
566
199
/
Fuel Economy
/
9.1
70
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✔
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Rear
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
8AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
MacPherson
/
Multi-link
/
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✔
/
Disc
/
235/60 R19
/
235/60 R19
/
Exterior
✔
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
3.3 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
254
345 BHP
/
500
Technologies
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
