T2 Luxury vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2023 3.5L 3 Door mid Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Attractive and modern design
- Outstanding financial value
- Spacious interior space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Suspension tuning is strict
- Average noise insulation
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 154976
TBD
SAR 149080
TBD
SAR 2086
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.13 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.15
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 106.02
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 469.5
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5527.93
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
180
4
/
/
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
1880
/
20
/
5 Doors
/
4785
4385
2006
1875
1880
1850
2800
2560
/
500
220 mm
/
Fuel Economy
/
7.7
/
69
/
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Rear Electronic Limited Slip Differential
✓
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Real time 4WD
/
Limited-Slip Differential
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
255/55R20
/
255/55R20
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
3.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
/
/
/
/
380 BHP
184 BHP
/
303
Technologies
✓
✓
Sports, Economy, Standard, Snow, Sediment, Rock, X Smart Mode
/
Auto
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
