T2 Luxury Plus 2026 vs Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Attractive and modern design
- Outstanding financial value
- Spacious interior space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Suspension tuning is strict
- Average noise insulation
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 152825
TBD
SAR 147024
TBD
SAR 2057
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 384.45
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
210
4
6
/
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
7 Seater
1880
/
20
/
5 Doors
/
4612
5100
2006
1994
1880
1756
2800
3010
/
566
220 mm
/
Fuel Economy
/
9.1
/
/
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Rear Electronic Limited Slip Differential
/
8AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Real time 4WD
/
Limited-Slip Differential
/
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
255/55R20
/
255/55R20
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
/
/
/
/
250
345 BHP
/
500
Technologies
✓
✓
Sports, Economy, Standard, Snow, Sediment, Rock, X Smart Mode
/
Auto
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
