T77 Limousine vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 101340
SAR 149327
SAR 97498
SAR 143635
SAR 1364
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.7
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 102.9
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 273.42
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 455.7
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5365.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1515
/
5
5 Doors
4525
4760 mm
1845
1930 mm
1615
1927 mm
2700
2750 mm
560
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
15.5
10 Km/L
45
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
12.3
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
6
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
225/45 R19
/
225/45 R19
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 T
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
168 BHP
224 BHP
142/5500
/
258
387 Nm
1500/4350
/
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
