Taurus Titanium Hybrid vs C 63 AMG Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- An excellent balance between comfort and performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Advanced technology features
Negative
- Fuel consumption is above average
- Unavailability of all-wheel drive
- Difficulty maneuvering in narrow areas
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.04 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 4.66
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 32.62
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 144.46
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 1700.9
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
220 Nm/115(Battery)
/
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
/
19
/
5 Doors
/
4972 mm
/
1875 mm
/
1498 mm
/
2930 mm
/
520 L
/
205 mm
/
Fuel Economy
23.4
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
8" Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
13.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
235/45 R19
/
235/45 R19
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
/
Hybrid
/
4
/
185HP/64HP(Battery)
/
382 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Normal, Sport, Eco
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
