Taurus Titanium Hybrid vs Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+ Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- An excellent balance between comfort and performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Advanced technology features
Negative
- Fuel consumption is above average
- Unavailability of all-wheel drive
- Difficulty maneuvering in narrow areas
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.04 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 4.66
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 32.62
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 144.46
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 325.04
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 1700.9
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
250
4
8
1998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
19
/
5 Doors
/
4972 mm
4993
1875 mm
1907
1498 mm
1460
2930 mm
2939
520 L
540
205 mm
/
Fuel Economy
23.4
11.0
/
66
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
8" Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
13.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
235/45 R19
/
235/45 R19
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
4.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
4
/
185HP/64HP(Battery)
612 BHP
382 Nm
850
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Normal, Sport, Eco
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
