Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL vs Tank 700 Limited Edition Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Positive
- Comprehensive safety specifications
- Exceptional engine power
- Luxury interior design
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Large car size
- Relatively high price
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.13
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 63.91
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 283.03
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3332.45
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5115
/
1980
/
1920
/
Fuel Economy
9.3
10
110
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front & Second row seats
/
Nappa Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
256 -Color rhythmic breathing atmosphere light
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
16.2 Inch
Transmission
Automatic
9-Speed Automatic Transmission
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
275/60 R22
/
275/60 R22
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Electric
Engine
3.3 L
3.0 L
Diesel
Gasoline
304 BHP
348 BHP
700
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Electronic
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
