Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL vs Tiggo 4 Pro COM Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.13
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 63.91
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 273.9
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3332.45
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
SUV
/
Engine / Motor
6
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
5115
4318
1980
1831
1920
1662
/
Flush Door
/
17
/
5
/
2610
Fuel Economy
9.3
/
110
/
Comfort
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Manual
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Interior
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✔
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✔
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
Cloth
/
✔
Safety
✔
✔
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✔
✔
/
✔
/
/
Dual Front Airbags
/
✔
/
✔
Infotainment
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✔
/
10.25
/
✔
/
✔
/
4
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
✔
/
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
Exterior
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✔
✔
/
✔
✔
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
/
Electric
/
✔
/
✔
Engine
3.3 L
1.5 L
Diesel
Gasoline
304 BHP
111 BHP
700
/
/
1.5L
Technologies
✔
/
✔
✔
✔
/
✔
✔
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
ECO, Normal
/
✔