Land Cruiser Prado 2.8T TXL-2 Diesel vs Honda CR-V 2023 2.4 EX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong performance in rough terrain
- Reliability and durability
- Spacious and comfortable interior
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High maintenance and repair costs
- Traditional interior design
Positive
- High reliability and durable performance
- A wide range of security technologies
- Excellent fuel efficiency
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Lack of hybrid drive options in some markets
- Limited charging capacity compared to some competitors
Price Comparison
SAR 233070
SAR 140937
SAR 224250
SAR 135585
SAR 3137
SAR 1897
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.81
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.67
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 180.11
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 325.04
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2120.65
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
18
/
5005
4550
1980
1820
1992
1680
/
2620
/
1053
Fuel Economy
14.1
11.0
110
58
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Doors
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
7
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Synthethic Leather
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Dual
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Front Airbags Driver & Passenger + D&P Knee + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Central
/
8-Speed Automatic Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R18
/
265/65 R18
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.8
2.4 L
Diesel
Gasoline
201
188 BHP
500
222
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
