Tucson Comfort 1.6L vs Mitsubishi ASX 2024 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive interior and exterior design
- Excellent riding comfort and stable driving experience
- Availability of advanced security and assistance technologies
Negative
- Internal details and quality of materials need to be improved
- Engine response and noise at high speeds
- Storage space is limited as much as
Positive
- Attractive and striking exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Reliable and consistent performance
Negative
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- The infotainment system is outdated
- Limited engine choices
Price Comparison
SAR 93393
SAR 93160
SAR 89865
SAR 89600
SAR 1257
SAR 1254
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.96
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.52
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 90.72
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 80.64
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 362.88
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 322.56
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4730.4
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4204.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
193
4
4
1596 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4500 mm
4355
1865 mm
1810
1650 mm
1625
2680 mm
2670
620 L
358
210 m
/
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
12.5
54 L
63
11 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
177 BHP
150 BHP
264 Nm
197
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
