Urban Cruiser GL vs Honda CR-V 2023 2.4 EX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish exterior design meets the taste of youth
- Economical fuel consumption suitable for daily commuting
- Reliable service network and rich security features
Negative
- The engine performance is average, especially at high speeds
- Limited back row space for large families
- The entertainment and control system is simple compared to competitors
Positive
- High reliability and durable performance
- A wide range of security technologies
- Excellent fuel efficiency
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Lack of hybrid drive options in some markets
- Limited charging capacity compared to some competitors
Price Comparison
SAR 86183
SAR 140937
SAR 82915
SAR 135585
SAR 1160
SAR 1897
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.83
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.78
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 180.58
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 325.04
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2126.13
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
/
200
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4365
4550
1795
1820
1645
1680
2600
2620
210
/
/
1053
Fuel Economy
19.8
11.0
45 L
58
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Rear
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Driver And Front Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
6 Speed Automatic Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
101 BHP
188 BHP
135
222
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
