Urban Cruiser GL vs CS35 Plus Trend Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish exterior design meets the taste of youth
- Economical fuel consumption suitable for daily commuting
- Reliable service network and rich security features
Negative
- The engine performance is average, especially at high speeds
- Limited back row space for large families
- The entertainment and control system is simple compared to competitors
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 86183
SAR 70570
SAR 82915
SAR 67850
SAR 1160
SAR 950
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.83
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.78
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 180.58
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2126.13
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
17
4365
4335
1795
1825
1645
1660
2600
2600
210
/
/
4
Fuel Economy
19.8
17.3
45 L
53
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Smart Key
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
✓
Fabric
Mocha Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Rear
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Driver And Front Passenger + Side + Curtain
Dual Airbag (Driver & Passenger)
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
10.25 Inch
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
4
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
6 Speed Automatic Transmission
DCT
/
DCT
/
7
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
Electric
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
215/55 R17
215/60 R17
215/55 R17
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.4 T
Gasoline
Gasoline
101 BHP
158 BHP
135
260
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Sport
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
