Urban Cruiser GL vs GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish exterior design meets the taste of youth
- Economical fuel consumption suitable for daily commuting
- Reliable service network and rich security features
Negative
- The engine performance is average, especially at high speeds
- Limited back row space for large families
- The entertainment and control system is simple compared to competitors
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 86183
SAR 180471
SAR 82915
SAR 173654
SAR 1160
SAR 2429
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.83
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.78
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 180.58
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2126.13
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
/
200 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
17
/
4365
4980 mm
1795
1950 mm
1645
1780 mm
2600
2920 mm
210
/
Fuel Economy
19.8
13.3 Km/L
45 L
66 L
/
13.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Rear
/
Safety
✓
/
Driver And Front Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Infotainment
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
✓
/
6 Speed Automatic Transmission
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
101 BHP
248 BHP
135
400 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
