Urban Cruiser GL vs GS3 1.3T GB Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish exterior design meets the taste of youth
- Economical fuel consumption suitable for daily commuting
- Reliable service network and rich security features
Negative
- The engine performance is average, especially at high speeds
- Limited back row space for large families
- The entertainment and control system is simple compared to competitors
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 86183
SAR 74221
SAR 82915
SAR 71402
SAR 1160
SAR 999
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.83
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.78
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 180.58
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2126.13
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4365
4350 mm
1795
1825 mm
1645
1680 mm
2600
2560 mm
210
/
/
370 L
Fuel Economy
19.8
13.3 Km/L
45 L
50 L
/
13.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Rear
/
Safety
✓
/
Driver And Front Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Infotainment
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
✓
/
6 Speed Automatic Transmission
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5 L
1.3 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
101 BHP
202 BHP
135
137 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
