Urban Cruiser GL vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2023 3.5L 3 Door mid Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish exterior design meets the taste of youth
- Economical fuel consumption suitable for daily commuting
- Reliable service network and rich security features
Negative
- The engine performance is average, especially at high speeds
- Limited back row space for large families
- The entertainment and control system is simple compared to competitors
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 86183
TBD
SAR 82915
TBD
SAR 1160
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.13 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.83
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.15
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.78
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 106.02
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 180.58
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 469.5
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2126.13
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5527.93
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
/
180
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4365
4385
1795
1875
1645
1850
2600
2560
210
/
/
500
Fuel Economy
19.8
7.7
45 L
69
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Rear
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Driver And Front Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
6 Speed Automatic Transmission
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
101 BHP
184 BHP
135
303
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
