Urban Cruiser GL vs T1 Lux Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish exterior design meets the taste of youth
- Economical fuel consumption suitable for daily commuting
- Reliable service network and rich security features
Negative
- The engine performance is average, especially at high speeds
- Limited back row space for large families
- The entertainment and control system is simple compared to competitors
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Strong performance in its price category
- Spacious and comfortable interior
Negative
- Fuel economy can be improved
- Limited options for the entertainment system
- A less widespread agent network
Price Comparison
SAR 86183
TBD
SAR 82915
TBD
SAR 1160
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.05 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 7.2
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 7.2
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 50.4
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 50.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2628
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2628
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4365
4706
1795
1967
1645
1845
2600
2810
210
/
/
5
/
1690
/
1700
Fuel Economy
19.8
20
45 L
70
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
7
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Rear
/
Safety
✓
/
Driver And Front Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
✓
/
6 Speed Automatic Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
101 BHP
251 BHP
135
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
