VF9 2025 Eco vs Porsche Cayenne 2023 Turbo Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Sports driving dynamics
- Luxurious and distinctive interior design
- Long-range driving comfort
Negative
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- High fuel consumption
- Limited use of vehicle space
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.12 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.98
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 97.86
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 419.4
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5102.7
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
286
/
8
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
20
/
5119
4926
2004
1983
1691
1673
3148
2895
212
745
Fuel Economy
75
90
/
8.4
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front & Back Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
Driver Seat
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
11
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
✓
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Independent, Double Wishbone
/
Multi-link with Air Spring
/
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
4.0 L
Electric
Gasoline
402 BHP
550 BHP
620
770
Motor
Dual Motor
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Eco / Normal / Sport
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
