VF9 2025 Eco vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.13
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 63.91
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 273.9
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3332.45
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
6
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
20
/
5119
5115
2004
1980
1691
1920
3148
/
212
/
Fuel Economy
75
110
/
9.3
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front & Back Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
11
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
✓
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Independent, Double Wishbone
/
Multi-link with Air Spring
/
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
3.3 L
Electric
Diesel
402 BHP
304 BHP
620
700
Motor
Dual Motor
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Eco / Normal / Sport
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
