Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T vs 212 Adventure Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Classic and attractive design
- Wide customization capability
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Driving comfort is less on ordinary roads
- The high price of fully equipped models
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 220139
SAR 127048
SAR 211794
SAR 122237
SAR 2963
SAR 1710
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.14 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 16.31
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 114.17
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 489.3
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 384.45
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5953.15
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
6
/
3600 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4785 mm
4705
1877 mm
1895
1801 mm
1936
3007 mm
2860
487 L
/
246 m
235
/
2150
/
1598
/
1598
/
40
/
36
/
23.6
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
9.1
87 L
80
7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
Transmission
/
AT
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
V
/
3.6 L
2.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
/
285 BHP
248 BHP
352 Nm
410
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
