CarteaCompare CarsWrangler Sport 3.6L M/T vs 900 2.0T Ultra

Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T vs 900 2.0T Ultra Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Superior off-road capability
  • Classic and attractive design
  • Wide customization capability

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • Driving comfort is less on ordinary roads
  • The high price of fully equipped models

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Price Comparison

SAR 220139

TBD

SAR 211794

TBD

SAR 2963

TBD

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.14 L/KM

0 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

SAR 16.31

Daily Fule Payment

/

Weekly Fule Payment

SAR 114.17

Weekly Fule Payment

/

Monthly Fule Payment

SAR 489.3

Monthly Fule Payment

/

Yearly Fule Payment

SAR 5953.15

Yearly Fule Payment

/

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

/

4.6

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

240

6

4

3600 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

6

4 Doors

/

4785 mm

5240

1877 mm

1999

1801 mm

1810

3007 mm

3160

487 L

/

246 m

/

Fuel Economy

7 Km/L

/

87 L

/

7 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front and Back Row Seats

Leather

/

Digital

/

Single

/

/

/

/

Manual

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

9

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

DHT

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

275/45 R21

/

275/45 R21

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Halogen

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

3.6 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

4

/

285 BHP

540 BHP

352 Nm

1038

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

Jeep Related Car

Lynk & Co Related Car