X-TRAIL S 4WD 7 Seats vs Changan CS95 2020 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 117240
SAR 119538
SAR 112800
SAR 114989
SAR 1578
SAR 1609
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.64
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.4
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 60.48
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 100.8
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 259.2
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 432
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3153.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5256
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
Engine / Motor
/
185
/
4
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
17
/
4
/
4680
4949
2065
1930
1730
1790
2705
2810
212
/
Fuel Economy
15.7
10.5
55
74
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
TFT
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
✓
✓
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
✓
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Independent strut
/
Multi Link
/
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
181 BHP
233 BHP
181 @ 6,000
/
244
360
244 @ 4,000
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
AUTO-ECO-SPORT-SNOW-OFF ROAD
/
Manual
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
