X35 1.5L CVT Luxury vs ZS 1.5L STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
SAR 57869
SAR 57134
SAR 55643
SAR 54970
SAR 779
SAR 769
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
170
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1340
1318
17
17
4286
4323
1815
1809
1665
1653
2560
2585
1765
/
390
359/1166
180
145
/
5
Fuel Economy
46
45
/
17.2
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
Front Row Seats
Leather Fabric Mixed Seats
Fabric
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Driver And Passenger Airbag.Side Airbag.
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
T125/80 R15
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
6
4
/
10.1
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
MacPhersan
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
H torsion beam type
H Torsional Beam
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Solid Disc
Disc
215/50 R17
215/55 R17
215/50 R17
215/55 R17
/
Disc
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
Engine
1.5
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
134
118 BHP
210
180
/
88
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
