X50 LUX vs Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Advanced technologies for security systems
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average fuel efficiency
- The availability of spare parts can be limited
- Less dynamic driving experience
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Classic and attractive design
- Wide customization capability
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Driving comfort is less on ordinary roads
- The high price of fully equipped models
Price Comparison
TBD
SAR 220139
TBD
SAR 211794
TBD
SAR 2963
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.14 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 16.31
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 114.17
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 489.3
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5953.15
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
6
/
3600 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
/
4 Doors
/
4785 mm
/
1877 mm
/
1801 mm
/
3007 mm
/
487 L
/
246 m
Fuel Economy
/
7 Km/L
/
87 L
/
7 Km/L
Comfort
✔
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✔
/
✔
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
4
/
/
/
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
12
✔
✓
6
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
6-DCT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✔
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
154 BHP
285 BHP
/
V
/
4
/
352 Nm
Technologies
✔
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
