X50 Premium 2026 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Advanced technologies for security systems
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average fuel efficiency
- The availability of spare parts can be limited
- Less dynamic driving experience
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.13
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 63.91
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 283.03
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3332.45
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
6
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
18
/
4397
5115
1841
1980
1654
1920
Fuel Economy
/
9.3
/
110
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
4
/
/
/
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
/
✔
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6-DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Macpherson independent suspension
/
Multiple link independent suspension
/
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✔
✓
Disc
/
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Diesel
Turbocharge
/
156
304 BHP
230
700
Technologies
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
