X70 Plus Comfort 1.6T vs Hyundai Kona 2023 2.0L Comfort 2 Tone Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and attractive exterior design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Excellent financial value for money for features
Negative
- The quality of internal manufacturing needs to be improved
- The suspension system needs better tuning
- Noise control is poor on highways
Positive
- Modern and stylish design
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Advanced technical features
Negative
- Limited storage space
- Poor off road performance
- Light noise inside the cabin at high speeds
Price Comparison
TBD
SAR 99627
TBD
SAR 95835
TBD
SAR 1341
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
194
4
4
1598 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4749 mm
4165
1900 mm
1801
1720 mm
1565
2745 mm
2600
480 L
544
210 mm
/
Fuel Economy
13 Km/L
13.3
57 L
50
13 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
197 BHP
150 BHP
290 Nm
180
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
